The Distinction Between Individualistic and Class Evidence is Usually Easy to Make
journal article
Electric current Anthropology
, pp. 121-134 (14 pages)
Published Past: The University of Chicago Printing
https://www. jstor .org/stable/2742970
With a personal account, you tin read upward to 100 manufactures each month for free.
Already have an account?
- Admission everything in the JPASS drove
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download upward to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download upwardly to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
Purchase a PDF
How does information technology work?
- Select the purchase option.
- Check out using a credit carte or bank account with
PayPal . - Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.
This paper examines, at the level of values, the relationship betwixt individualism and equality. It has been widely held, since the time of Tocqueville, that, whereas traditional societies emphasize hierarchical values and collective identities, modern societies are marked by their simultaneous concern for equality and the individual. The supposition of a correspondence between individualism and equality appears to be challenged past programmes of affirmative discrimination in which collective identities are stressed, sometimes at the expense of private claims, as a part of the pursuit of equality. Here the idea is that individual mobility is non enough to reduce sure disparities between groups and that special measures may be required to reduce these disparities and make equality more than secure and meaningful. The relationship between individualism and equality is a complex 1. Individualism might lead to either an appreciation of human equality or a preoccupation with the inequality of man. 1 may, following Simmel, brand a distinction between the "individualism of equality" and the "individualism of inequality." Individualism is linked most clearly with equality of opportunity or the idea of "careers open up to talent," merely information technology is linked besides with the idea of natural inequality, and potent individualists tend to be opposed to "levelling" and to considerations of distributive justice. The disjunction between individualism and equality is seen virtually clearly in contemporary economic doctrine, where the strongest proponents of individualism are the ones most actively opposed to the promotion of equality.
Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue.Current Anthropology is a transnational journal devoted to enquiry on humankind, encompassing the full range of anthropological scholarship on homo cultures and on the human and other primate species. Communicating across the subfields, the periodical features papers in a broad variety of areas, including social, cultural, and physical anthropology likewise as ethnology and ethnohistory, archaeology and prehistory, sociology, and linguistics.
Since its origins in 1890 equally 1 of the 3 main divisions of the University of Chicago, The University of Chicago Printing has embraced as its mission the obligation to disseminate scholarship of the highest standard and to publish serious works that promote pedagogy, foster public understanding, and enrich cultural life. Today, the Journals Division publishes more than 70 journals and hardcover serials, in a wide range of academic disciplines, including the social sciences, the humanities, pedagogy, the biological and medical sciences, and the physical sciences.
This item is role of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Electric current Anthropology © 1986 The University of Chicago Press
Source: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2742970
Post a Comment for "The Distinction Between Individualistic and Class Evidence is Usually Easy to Make"